Throughout the service, I was timing everything. I wrote down the time at the end of each line in the liturgy, and after every song.
By the time we were halfway through the first hymn, I could tell that we were going to end early.
I had already decided to, since I had so much ambivalence about how the images would play in concert with the service, have the projection end before the sermon, and then maybe do something different later.
Halfway through the first hymn, I realized that my timing guesses hadn't been great: I had read the liturgy aloud and sung a hymn by myself in the lonely little editing room beforehand, but hymns vary so much and the tempo of any given piano player could make them vary even more.
After conversations with Harry, Marcia & Michele, I decided that I would definitely end with a still that would remain projected throughout the service.
I didn't really hear much feedback from anyone, afterwards, partly because I didn't want to: I hid in the basement where Lynn was in charge of three year olds. I kind of didn't want anyone to have the pressure to say anything to me, and I just wanted to be able to fix it before anyone felt that pressure.
The only feedback I did get was from Phil, who commented that the first sequence made him think about the fact that in all these years of working at a hospital, he's always wondered what it would look like to be wheeled down the halls on a gurney: now he knew.
Showing posts with label "liturgical art". Show all posts
Showing posts with label "liturgical art". Show all posts
Tuesday, January 8, 2008
Monday, January 7, 2008
Photos of the Sanctuary
Here's the mirror at the back of the sanctuary. The mirror faces the screen like most of the congregation, so the idea that it is a symbol of our perception, hopefully occurs to congregants as they all file past the mirrors on the way out.

This view allows you to see the relative distance from the mirror to the front (where I was standing when I took the picture).

Here's the image I created by exporting a still from the film, before it achieved clarity (or before we have an epiphany) and then composited a shot of the mirror on it's side.

Here's how it looked on the liturgy covers.

And here's liturgy books spread across a pew.

Michele created the fabric transfer and sewed it to the altar cloth (two photos, here, one that contextualizes the altar with the baptismal font and the Christcandle):


I loved the slight modification Michele made to create the stohl Harry wears. You can see that she centered the flame and then extended the shattered lines in a way that emphasizes the arrival of light...

This view allows you to see the relative distance from the mirror to the front (where I was standing when I took the picture).
Here's the image I created by exporting a still from the film, before it achieved clarity (or before we have an epiphany) and then composited a shot of the mirror on it's side.

Here's how it looked on the liturgy covers.
And here's liturgy books spread across a pew.
Michele created the fabric transfer and sewed it to the altar cloth (two photos, here, one that contextualizes the altar with the baptismal font and the Christcandle):
I loved the slight modification Michele made to create the stohl Harry wears. You can see that she centered the flame and then extended the shattered lines in a way that emphasizes the arrival of light...
Thursday, September 27, 2007
Gestation
Over coffee at Muggswigz, Michele and I talked about how we could work together to have our two liturgical seasons connect to one another.
She described the centerpiece of the advent art as including a descending globe made out of glass, with the burning Christcandle inside. The globe would descend throughout the season of Advent, until, at Christmas it would be at eye level -- God With Us.
My idea had been that the Epiphany video installation would center on an image that in some way signified Christ -- that would very slowly, very gradually become clearer throughout the course of the service.
I had been inspired by her description of the germ of her advent idea on Sunday when we chatted, and so had tried to combine the two ideas:
What if the image that gradually became clear was the candle descending in the globe.
As our coffee time progressed, we added the possibility of having the globe actually descend from the sky so that the blurry image would be beautiful even while it was blurry (a value that I always had about the idea was that the congregation would be looking at the screen for the first half of the service BOTH puzzled by it's hazy indistinctness AND quietly happy about how the indiscernible light looked beautiful).
Another idea that emerged during coffee came wholly out of our conversation, and since I had NONE of it going it, I suspect that Michele contributed more on this one, but... it was:
I had a concern that the video would be too front focused -- and not as inclusive or dialogical as much of the art in our church is.
So the idea emerged of having three banners hanging near the perimeters of where the congregation sits, all of which would be covered in mirror fragments.
During the scripture reading, we would invite a member of the congregation to go to these banners, which would be shrouded up to this point, and, while gazing at the clarifying screen image, remove the shroud.
In this version of our plan, the congregants would try to bring to mind an EPIPHANY that they had experienced in their lives as they removed the shrouds.
She described the centerpiece of the advent art as including a descending globe made out of glass, with the burning Christcandle inside. The globe would descend throughout the season of Advent, until, at Christmas it would be at eye level -- God With Us.
My idea had been that the Epiphany video installation would center on an image that in some way signified Christ -- that would very slowly, very gradually become clearer throughout the course of the service.
I had been inspired by her description of the germ of her advent idea on Sunday when we chatted, and so had tried to combine the two ideas:
What if the image that gradually became clear was the candle descending in the globe.
As our coffee time progressed, we added the possibility of having the globe actually descend from the sky so that the blurry image would be beautiful even while it was blurry (a value that I always had about the idea was that the congregation would be looking at the screen for the first half of the service BOTH puzzled by it's hazy indistinctness AND quietly happy about how the indiscernible light looked beautiful).
Another idea that emerged during coffee came wholly out of our conversation, and since I had NONE of it going it, I suspect that Michele contributed more on this one, but... it was:
I had a concern that the video would be too front focused -- and not as inclusive or dialogical as much of the art in our church is.
So the idea emerged of having three banners hanging near the perimeters of where the congregation sits, all of which would be covered in mirror fragments.
During the scripture reading, we would invite a member of the congregation to go to these banners, which would be shrouded up to this point, and, while gazing at the clarifying screen image, remove the shroud.
In this version of our plan, the congregants would try to bring to mind an EPIPHANY that they had experienced in their lives as they removed the shrouds.
Labels:
"liturgical art",
"video art",
art,
performance,
process,
space
Monday, December 22, 2003
Influenced by Jonny...
Just after I discovered the blogosphere, I happened upon JonnyBaker's blog.
I was intrigued because the Ph.D. he was just finishing (had just finished) dovetailed with my own in several interesting ways:
Jonny was also clearly someone devoted to Christianity, keenly committed to the arts, and very interested in building genuine community in cutting edge ways. All these factors made me really interested in his blog.
I had done a gig as a "worship pastor" (many years ago) but was completely turned off by the formal disconnect between the artistic ghetto that my particular branch of Christianity had become. I spent a while at two conservative evangelical churches, trying to translate some cultural forms into the worship, but the interest level was nominal -- certainly not a priority, so I decided to focus my life energy and artistic interests elsewhere. (Obviously that story could be written in a much longer way, but it's a bit off track for this blog.)
It was, though, this vested interested in the the forms of church worship and their (dis/)connect to/from cultural forms in the cultural spheres that surround churches that really generated a lot of interest in reading Jonny's Tricks section.
He's been chronicling for years the formal devices used by artists and worship leaders to articulate meaningful and fresh expressions of worship.
Viewing Viola's art through this context, encouraged me to think about how something LIKE this might be used in a liturgical art setting.
I was intrigued because the Ph.D. he was just finishing (had just finished) dovetailed with my own in several interesting ways:
we were both interested in popular culture performances,
we were both interested in the rhetorical dimension of these performances,
we were both making connections between ritual theory, performance theory and (me more than him) rhetorical theory.
Jonny was also clearly someone devoted to Christianity, keenly committed to the arts, and very interested in building genuine community in cutting edge ways. All these factors made me really interested in his blog.
I had done a gig as a "worship pastor" (many years ago) but was completely turned off by the formal disconnect between the artistic ghetto that my particular branch of Christianity had become. I spent a while at two conservative evangelical churches, trying to translate some cultural forms into the worship, but the interest level was nominal -- certainly not a priority, so I decided to focus my life energy and artistic interests elsewhere. (Obviously that story could be written in a much longer way, but it's a bit off track for this blog.)
It was, though, this vested interested in the the forms of church worship and their (dis/)connect to/from cultural forms in the cultural spheres that surround churches that really generated a lot of interest in reading Jonny's Tricks section.
He's been chronicling for years the formal devices used by artists and worship leaders to articulate meaningful and fresh expressions of worship.
Viewing Viola's art through this context, encouraged me to think about how something LIKE this might be used in a liturgical art setting.
Labels:
"liturgical art",
"video art",
art,
emergent,
performance
Monday, February 24, 2003
The Seed of Video Art...
While visiting L.A., I checked out the Getty Museum for the first time.
The video installations of Bill Viola were just as breath-taking as the devastatingly beautiful architecture and vistas of the and Grounds.
In Passions, Viola constructed painterly scenes of actors experiencing the passions that medieval painters, artists and philosophers wrote so vigorouslyhttp://www.blogger.com/img/gl.link.gif about. These scenes were shot in beautiful, dramatic light against severe dark backgrounds and then slowed down so completely that one had to stand and wait for what seemed like an eternity of patience before they would change.

The most jarring and exciting part of the exhibition, though was walking into a huge space where his installation called 5 Angels for the Millenium played: 5 cinema size screens simultaneously played images of a human diving into water (but filmed from inside the water, so...emerging into...?...the water), slowed down to a speed to make them look unrecognizable and otherworldly.

It was an unforgettable aesthetic experience: unmatched by any I had experienced before.
My interest in video art was piqued on that day. The most natural context for expressing it was, for me at that moment, shaped by some of the reading I had been doing, and the new church in which my family was becoming involved.
*
Here's a documentary about Bill Viola's work
The video installations of Bill Viola were just as breath-taking as the devastatingly beautiful architecture and vistas of the and Grounds.
In Passions, Viola constructed painterly scenes of actors experiencing the passions that medieval painters, artists and philosophers wrote so vigorouslyhttp://www.blogger.com/img/gl.link.gif about. These scenes were shot in beautiful, dramatic light against severe dark backgrounds and then slowed down so completely that one had to stand and wait for what seemed like an eternity of patience before they would change.

The most jarring and exciting part of the exhibition, though was walking into a huge space where his installation called 5 Angels for the Millenium played: 5 cinema size screens simultaneously played images of a human diving into water (but filmed from inside the water, so...emerging into...?...the water), slowed down to a speed to make them look unrecognizable and otherworldly.
It was an unforgettable aesthetic experience: unmatched by any I had experienced before.
My interest in video art was piqued on that day. The most natural context for expressing it was, for me at that moment, shaped by some of the reading I had been doing, and the new church in which my family was becoming involved.
*
Here's a documentary about Bill Viola's work
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)